茶怪預測今次立法會港島區補選，葉劉淑儀將擊敗陳方安生當選。因為中國主導的股市和經濟已經改變了港人的價值觀，內地股市帶動港股，資金「直通車」，准許內地個人投資者自由投資港股的概念更令港人如痴如醉，連政府入市干預市場自由運作，大家都冇乜所謂，傳媒大唱好，鼓勵齊齊跟港府追貨。香港經濟賴以為生的自由市場原則都拋諸腦後，大家都相信得要中央對香港好，甚麼自由市場他媽的，最緊要係中國市場。
陳太宣佈參選第二日，報紙頭版大字標題:「中央驚我」，分明趕客。代表新時代的葉劉會贏!
後記: 明報論壇方一匡的觀點值得參考。
11 則留言:
I am not as pessimistic as you do, because voters on the HK Island is supposed to be better educated and more sophisticated.
Also, there are still more than 2 months to go before the election. Will the stock market remain bullish for such a lnog time? I doubt.
But I don't understand why AM730 used 'PRC gov't is afraid of me' as the big heading... it's just copying the style from Headline Daily... *sigh*
doesn't matter if they are highly educated, sophisticated, or not, the rule of the game has become clear.
also, HK islanders are those pledging more money in the stock market.
and they need the market to pay tax in order to reduce their own tax burden.
凱哥你真係俾面。Thank you!
shhhhhhh
香港很多人還在懷念英國殖民地時代.
香港很多人都祟洋媚外．
所以我覺陳太還是有市場的．
呢場 show 應該都會幾好睇。
I think Mrs. Chan will win. From voters, everyone want '發財立品' and have '志氣', and Mrs. Chan can represent both '品' and '志氣'. From personal, everyone is selfish including Mrs. Chan. She comes out because she want to reach higher. So, her political mind will tend to like Mr. Donald Tsang. From PRC Government, every HK people is well educated and handleable. In fact, who is the winner, PRC Government doesn't matter.
有冇人可以話我知"郭亞女事件"的正反兩面，我睇左wikipedia，得正面，說陳太果斷。然後search yahoo，得大量複製wikipedia的文章，陳太果斷重複50次，都係得正面。
當時傳媒評擊陳太的決定，為什麼? 你有沒有當時評擊陳太的原文? 請提供茶怪參考。
除了"郭亞女事件"，陳太有甚麼功績令cheung或者你覺得她有'發財立品'和'志氣'的特質?
I am not saying Mrs. Chan is 有'品' and '志氣'. But compare with Yip Lau, most of the voters think Mrs. Chan can represent '品' and '志氣' rather than just follow the instruction from PRC Government. Besides, only the voters want '發財立品' and have '志氣' not Mrs. Chan herself.
thank you for leaving me comment again, Cheung. i misread your first comment.
i just wonder if i get lost in direction in a desert and come across Mrs. Chan and Yip Lau, one after another. You ask them for direction. Mrs. Chan points to east and Yip Lau points to west. Which way will you go?
Does impression rule the game of election? Or shall i, trying to be a responsible voter, vote according to assessment of their performance record? i don't have an answer.
I don't think voters will use their time to do a detail report to study their past performance or they have such a good memory to memorize their past performance. In fact, the atmosphere right now is conclusive. Mrs. Chan represent right and Yip Lau represent left. Besides, if voters are always such rational, no one will go to vote as both of them have bad history. One more point, if people have good memory, no one will buy stock now if they can remember 87 and 97.
發佈留言